Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 KAN 268 - State v. Harrison

State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1982

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is certainly true tliat, before the county commissioners of any county can appropriate any money tor the purpose of erecting any permanent county building, it is necessary that such commissioners should first submit the question of "appropriating such money or of erecting such building to the legal voters of the county. Comp. Laws 1879, p. 276, § 18; State v. Marion Co. [ 21 Kan. 419 ] supra. But. for the purpose of making necessary repairs or alterations of an already existing courthouse, it is not necessary that the question should be so submitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.