Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 KAN 435 - Cole v. Young

Cole v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1942
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1942

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

401880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keyser v. Rice · Engel v. Scheuerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question is: Under what circumstances will a court of equity restrain a party from invoking the aid of the courts and processes of another state? It certainly will not do that simply to compel him to carry on his litigation at home. It will not act upon the basis of any distrust of the courts of a sister state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.