24 Kan. App. 2d 1 - State v. Hills’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · In re Sturm · State v. Faulkner · State v. Damm · State v. Garcia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““I cannot permit your client to testily without taking the stand and that in fact what’s going on if the Court permits you to question the Officer about his conversation with your client and get his responses or his comments into the record is veiy self-serving. It does prevent the State and deny the State the right of confrontation to pursue the matters. Until such time as he [the defendant] takes the stand and on his own denies, if that indeed occurs, it is the Court’s view these questions are inappropriate and his response to questions by and large from the second part of the tape as to ownership of the cocaine, et cetera, or his particular knowledge are inappropriate unless and until he testifies at which time it becomes relevant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hills
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.