24 Kan. App. 2d 125 - Spencer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Meacham · State v. Alderson · State v. Bird · People v. Foster · United States v. Morales-Rosales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f a defendant enters into a beneficial plea agreement voluntarily and intelligently, he or she forfeits the right to attack any underlying infirmity in the charge to which he or she pled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pollman“'[H]is plea may relate to a hypothetical situation without objective basis.' 19 N.Y.2d at 154”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pollman“because the defendant received the benefit of a bargain into which he freely entered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pollman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.