24 Kan. App. 2d 882 - State v. Bolin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We are not unmindful of the decision of a panel of this court in State v. Christensen, 23 Kan. App. 2d 910 , 937 P.2d 1239 (1997). Suffice it to say, we do not agree with that decision as it pertains to the issue of whether and how K.S.A. 21-4720(b)(5) should be applied when sentencing a defendant for multiple crimes arising from several charging documents all on the same day.” 24 Kan. App. 2d at 886 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bolin

2. ““The double rale limit [in K.S.A. 21-4720(b)(4)] applies only to cases involving multiple convictions arising from multiple counts within an information, complaint, or indictment, not multiple convictions arising from separate cases pled to on the same date.” 259 Kan. at 114 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bolin