Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Ky. 585

Dunn v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 17, 1829

Court of Appeals of Kentucky · decided 1829-06-17

<p> Practice in chancery. </p> <p>Erroneous to permit amendmentin the progress of trial; but if merits not affected, decree will not be reversed.</p>

Decided 1829-06-17

Judge Underwood

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2It was irregular to permit an amendatory answer to be filed in the progress of the trial, and then to proceed with it without giving the complainant an opportunity to contest the matter of the answer; and had it been shown in this case, that the complainant had been prejudiced by it, we should have reversed the decree. But without the amendatory answer the court should have decreed for the defendants, upon the state of the pleadings and proof.

¶3Decree affirmed with costs.

/24/ky/585 · .json · Public domain