Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 MICH 180 - Wright v. Wright

Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1871

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1970

7 state decisions

2018711880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the case would be such that both that state (Indiana) and this had authority in respect to the marriage relation, to determine upon its validity, or to dissolve it, so far as the party resident within its own limits is concerned. If one proceeds first, there is no legal impediment to the other’s taking like steps afterwards, if it appears important to the protection of any property or other rights.” (Par. ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Our Legislature has thought in some cases it might be necessary to do so, and has provided for «it by statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.