Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Misc. 94

People v. Wolf

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1898

New York Supreme Court · decided 1898-03-15

<p>Violations of the Liquor Tax Law in the Greater New York — Jury trial — Misdemeanor.</p> <p>A person; charged with the misdemeanor of violating the Liquor Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 112), in the borough of. Brooklyn, is not entitled to a trial by jury but may legally be tried at a Court of Special .Sessions held by three magistrates.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1901

1 state decisions

Relies on People Ex Rel. Comaford v. . Dutcher · People Ex Rel. Murray v. Justices of Court of Special Sessions of Peace

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1898-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dickey, J.

¶1Since the Constitution was amended in 1870, providing that Courts of Special Sessions shall have jurisdiction of the -offenses of the grade of misdemeanor, as may be provided by law, it has been held in People ex rel. Comaford v. Dutcher, 83 N. Y. 240, that when the Constitution conferred authority upon Courts -of Special Sessions to try misdemeanors, it meant the courts in -question as they were and might be constituted by the legislature, whether they authorized a jury of six, or othenoise. In this case "the legislature has provided otherwise by Special Sessions of three magistrates. It was also held in People ex rel. Murray v. Justices, 74 N. Y. 406, that the constitutional provision, giving a party .a right of trial by jury, does not apply to petty offenses triable before a Court of Special Sessions. I think all this class of cases, violations of the excise laws, should be speedily tried before the Special Sessions, and should not be removed. The grand jury has ¿plenty of work now, and should not be further burdened.

¶2Motion for certificate of removal denied.

/24/misc/94 · .json · Public domain