¶1The case seems to have been set for'trial by consent on a particular day in tbe return term, and was on that day postponed by like consent to a subsequent day in the same term. And the defendant, after a trial in his absence at the time agreed upon, can not withdraw his consent by subsequently insisting that the cause was not triable of right at that term. He has concluded himself by his own act, even if he were in time with his motion. The judgment is affirmed.
24 Mo. 27
Boernstein v. Heinrichs
Decided October 15, 1856
Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1856-10-15
<p>1. Where a cause by consent of parties is set for trial on a particular day in the return term, and the same is tried in the absence of the defendant and a judgment rendered against him; held, that he is precluded from insisting, in support of a motion to set aside the judgment rendered, that the cause was not triable of right at the return term.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1858
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1856-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →