Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Mo. 380

State v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1857

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1857-01-15

<p>1. An indictment, under section 57 of article 3 of the act concerning Crimea and Punishments (R. C. 1845, p. 364), against a negro slave for maliciously killing a mare, must charge the act to have been done “ feloniously.”</p>

Relies on State v. Murdock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1969

4 state decisions

20185718601870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Scott, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The defendant, a slave, was indicted under the 57th section of the 3d article of the act concerning Crimes and Punishments, for wilfully and maliciously cutting the throat of a mare, the property of Charles Crane, whereby she was killed. After a trial and conviction, a motion was made in arrest of judgment, *381on the ground of defects in the indictment. This motion was overruled, and an appeal was taken to this court.

¶3The indictment was for a felony, and was clearly bad for want of the word “feloniously.” Nothing is better settled than that in all indictments for felonies, the criminal act must be alleged to have been feloniously done. (State v. Murdock, 9 Mo. 730.)

¶4It was hinted that the indictment might be sustained under the 38th section of the 8th article of the act concerning Crimes and Punishments. (R. C. 1845.) Without inquiring whether such is the case, it is enough to remark that the section to which reference is made constitutes the act therein prohibited a misdemeanor ; and slaves for a misdemeanor are not liable to an indictment, but must be proceeded with before a justice of the peace of the county in which the offence is committed. (Secs. 27 & 28, art. 9, R. C. 1845, p. 413.) The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed.

/24/mo/380 · .json · Public domain