24 N.C. App. 28 - In Re Simmons’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2002
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. California · State v. Lynch · In Re Burrus · State v. Barnes · State v. Vickers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Use of one’s telephone clearly involves substantial privacy interests which the State may recognize and protect. G.S. § 14-196(a)(l) seeks to protect that interest from an invasion made in an essentially intolerable manner. The means chosen by the Legislature were both appropriate and sufficiently narrowed to achieving the legitimate ends sought to be attained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]t is generally accepted that a statement made to a private individual is not inadmissible by virtue of the private individual’s failure to warn the accused in terms of the Miranda requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“profane, vulgar, lewd, lascivious or indecent character, nature or connotation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.