¶1The motions in the case at bar present the same questions that were just decided by us in the case of Burger v. Sinclair, post, 326, 140 N. W. 235, and the decision in that case controls this. The same order will accordingly be made herein with the exception that no costs are allowed.
24 ND 325
Hawkins v. Sinclair
Decided November 20, 1912
North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1912-11-20
<p>Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal and also to vacate an order made by a judge of this court permitting a supersedeas undertaking on appeal to be given.</p>
The motion denied and second motion granted · Decided 1912-11-20