Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Nev. 306 - Marx v. Lewis

Marx v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
February 1925
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1925

9 state decisions

501898190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Menzies v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The method of procedure in taking appeals is regulated by statute. Section 327 of the civil practice act (Comp. Laws, 3422) in direct terms confers authority. upon this court to review judgments and orders from which appeals can be taken in the manner prescribed by the act,' and not otherwise.’” (Marx v. Lewis, 24 Nev. 306 .) Section 336 of the civil practice act (Comp. Laws, 3431) provides:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.