Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 N.J. 280 - State v. Burnett

State v. Burnett’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
6
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2004 · most notably STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. Gorga (1958), 119 N.J. Super. 457 - NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane (1971)

3 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

100195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Miller · Chicago Co v. City of Chicago · Olson v. United States · Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States · Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Recognizing that nearly all things may, if offered, create purchasing demand, the criterion of market value has been the gravitational pole for just compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We deal, then, in most valuation problems, in an evidential construction of a hypothetical sale between a willing and uncoerced seller and a like-minded buyer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the constitutional requirement is satisfied by a sum of money which fairly represents the transferable value of the property in the market place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.