Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 NM 100 - Gradi v. Bachechi

Gradi v. Bachechi’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1928
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jahren v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have no way of ascertaining what questions were presented by appellants to the trial court for decision, because of the state of the record. Included in the record proper is a paper purporting to be findings of fact and conclusions of law, requested by appellants, but refused by the trial court. That is the only1 paper in the record which even intimates what questions were presented to the trial court. That paper is not a part of the record proper under section 4491, Code 1915. As none of the questions argued by appellants are jurisdictional, there is nothing for us to review.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The record on appeal does not contain the transcript of the evidence taken at the trial. The findings are therefore conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.