Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 N.M. 331

State v. Crump

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1918

New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1918-03-04

Thomas Crump was convicted of assualt with a deadly weapon, and he appeals, and, upon his death pending appeal, his administratrix, Bessie L. Crump, applied to be substituted as appellant.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1977

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Proceeding ordered to abate · Decided 1918-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION OP THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

¶2Thomas Crump was convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in the district court for Roosevelt county. He was fined $200 and costs and from that sentence he has perfected this appeal.

¶3During the pendency of this appeal Crump died. Bessie L. Crump, administratrix of the estate of Thomas Crump, has applied here to be substituted as appellant.

¶4The general rule is that a judgment imposing a fine in a criminal case abates on the death of the defendant pending an appeal or writ of error, and the fine imposed cannot be enforced against the estate. 8 R. C. L. “Criminal Law,” § 283. See, also, United States v. Dunne, 173 Fed. 254, 97 C. C. A. 420, 19 Ann. Cas. 1145, and cases collected in note thereto. The reasons which underlie the rule are discussed therein.

¶5For the reasons stated, the proceedings in this action will abate; and it is so ordered.

Parker and Roberts, JJ., concur.
/24/nm/331 · .json · Public domain