Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 NY2D 91 - Menzel v. List

Menzel v. List’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
4
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably O'KEEFFE v. Snyder (1980), Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Industries, Inc. (1996)

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

340196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Armstrong v. Percy · Case v. Hall · Blasdale v. Babcock · Spillane v. Corey · Pillgrene v. James J. Paulman, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the loss directly and naturally resulting from the breach of warranty. In the absence of such circumstances showing proximate damage of a greater amount, this is the difference between the value of the goods at the time of delivery and the value they would have had if they had conformed to the warranty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.