24 Ohio App. 2d 31 - State v. Creachbaum’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2013
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hubbard v. Commonwealth · Koenig v. State · State v. Eikelberger · People v. Jacobson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no deception on the part of the drawer when the payee knows that there are not sufficient funds in the bank upon which the check is drawn.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““Q. What was the condition of his account at the First National Bank in Sabina in January, what was indicated to you by Bernard? “A. He didn’t have any money there. “Q. He didn’t have any money then? “A. No. “Q. Would that have been the time these checks were written? “A. Yes, I am sure that it was. «* * * “Q. You knew on January 12, 1967 that the $83,000 check was no good? “A. I had a feeling it wasn’t, yes. “Q. What about the $70,000 check when you took it? “A. I had the feeling it wasn’t, yes. “Q. But at the time you took them, at the time they were delivered to you did you know the checks were no good? “A. Well, yes I am sure I did. “Q. You knew they were no good? "A. Yes. “Q. The checks were taken by the bank with this knowledge, is that correct? “A. Yes, I would say so—yes. “Q. At any rate when yob accepted on January 12, exhibits 1 and 2 you knew that money was not in the Sabina Bank to cover those checks didn’t you at that time? “A. Sure. «* * He “Q. Starting with—all 18 of these checks you knew were no good when you got them? “4- Th&t is right,””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Creachbaum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.