24 Ohio App. 3d 6 - Associated Estates Corp. v. Bartell’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably 91 Ohio App. 3d 458 - Shimko v. Marks (1993), 93 Ohio App. 3d 819 - Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Younger (1994)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. United States · Escalera v. New York City Housing Authority · 67 Ga. App. 176 - Minkovitz v. Fine · 19 Wash. App. 871 - Housing Authority v. Saylors · 167 Ga. App. 181 - HOUSING AUTHORITY OF DeKALB COUNTY v. Pyrtle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A tenant in occupancy defending such an action is liable for rent during the pendency of the suit, and the landlord may accept rent paid for liability already incurred without acting inconsistently with the notice to vacate. But by accepting future rent payments, the landlord has waived the three-day notice since such acceptance is inconsistent with the landlord’s notice to vacate. * * *” Id. The court recognized that its holding on this issue “may place a landlord in a difficult position considering the length of time sometimes required to prosecute a forcible entry and detainer action. * * *” Id.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Repeated incidents of intoxication and irresponsible use of the kitchen facilities in your Unit [which] have imposed a threat [to] the peaceful enjoyment and safety of your neighbors. This conduct results in a violation of the provisions [of the lease and because of the violations] by you ... you are hereby notified that your Lease shall be terminated in ten days from the date of this Notice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Since appellee accepted future rent payments from appellant following service of the notice to vacate the premises, appellee has waived the statutory requirement of notice. * * *” (Emphasis sic.) Id. at 9 , 24 OBR at 31, 492 N.E. 2d at 845 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.