Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Bechtel

24 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Bechtel’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2021

11 state decisions

3019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 99 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Kramer · People v. Walker · State v. Ahern · 566 F. Supp. 1046 - United States v. Traficant · 160 N.J. Super. 238 - State v. Readding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when two tuning forks are used to ascertain the accuracy of the radar unit, additional proof of the accuracy of the tuning forks is not necessary. This is because each tuning fork corroborates the accuracy of the other, and it is highly unlikely that the radar unit and each tuning fork would be inaccurate to the same degree.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.