Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 OHIOST3D 87 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

167
cited by 167 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 156 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 167 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Lott (1990), State v. Landrum (1990)

6 federal appellate · 156 state decisions

59019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 167 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is conceivable that the omission of such evidence in an appropriate case could be in response to the demands of the accused or the result of a tactical, informed decision by counsel, completely consonant with his duties to represent the accused effectively”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “R.C. 2941.14(B) limits the aggravating circumstances which may be considered in imposing the death penalty to those specifically enumerated in R.C. 2929.04(A).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[d]efense counsel has a duty to investigate the circumstances of his client's case and explore all matters relevant to the merits of the case and the penalty, including the defendant's background, education, employment record, mental and emotional stability, and family relationships.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.