Loeb v. Loeb’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1934 · most notably Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co. (1913), Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Adams (1910)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. State · People ex rel. Kelly v. Raymond · Richardson v. Penny · Strom v. Montana Central Railway Co. · Hopewell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Supreme Court of the state of Kansas, in the case of Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Brassfield, 51 Kan. 167 , 32 Pac. 814 , says: ‘The charge of the court is a “proceeding” in a cause, and, where there is a statement in a case-made that it contains all of the proceedings in the cause, it will be held that all of the instructions are embodied therein/ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.