Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Okla. Crim. 441

218 P 552

Thomas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1923-10-06

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1923-10-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1980

9 state decisions

601923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOYLE, J.

¶1 The information in this case charges that appellant, F. C. Thomas, did in Cotton county, on the 14th day of December, 1921, willfully and unlawfully manufacture certain spirituous liquor, to wit, corn whisky. The trial resulted in a conviction, and punishment fixed at 40 days’ confinement in the county jail, and a fine of $100. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed by filing in this court on April 22, 1922, a petition! in error with case-made.

¶2 The Attorney General has filed a confession of error as follows:

“Nowhere in the record does it appear that there was ever introduced a scintilla of evidence of any kind or character showing that any corn or other liquor, capable of being used as a beverage, containing more than one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol measured by volume, was manufactured, or attempted to- be manufactured, by the plaintiff in error. We submit the record of the court as being one that doesn’t have a line of testimony contained therein to support the allega *442 tion of the information filed, and respectfully suggest that this cause be reversed. ’ ’

¶3 A careful examination of the record discloses that the evidence in the case is entirely insufficient to support the verdict and judgment of conviction.

¶4 The judgment is accordingly reversed.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.
/24/oklacrim/441 · .json · Public domain