¶1The only question for decision is, whether section 16 of Hill’s Code is designed to apply to a defendant who was a non-resident of the state at the time the cause of action arose. This question was considered in McCormick v. Blanchard, 7 Or. 232, and it was there held that section 16, when considered in connection with section 26, should be construed to apply to residents only, and this is decisive of the question now presented unless that case is to be overruled, and this, as at present advised, we are not prepared to do. Judgment aepirmed.
24 Or. 419
Crane v. Jones
Decided July 24, 1893
Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1893-07-24
Marion County: Geo. H. Burnett, Judge. This is an action by M. L. Crane against C. L. Jones. as endorser of a promissory note for one hundred and fifty dollars, dated the twenty-ninth of April, 1879, executed and made payable in the province of Ontario, Canada, due one month after date.
Relies on McCormick v. Blanchard
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1893-07-24
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1948
1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →