¶1The only question presented in this case is the constitutionality of the act, (Laws, 1893, p. 171), to provide for an issue of bonds for the improvement of streets and the paving of the same in incorporated cities, and for the payfnent of costs thereof by installments. This case is within the principle announced by this court in the case of Warren v. Crosby, ante, p. 558 (34 Pac. Rep. 661), and the act in question is constitutional, and the judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as may be necessary and proper.
24 Or. 588
Hoffman v. Branch
Decided July 1, 1892
Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1892-07-01
<p>Multnomah County: E. D. Shattuck, Judge.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-07-01
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1913
1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →