Multnomah County v. Sabin’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here a litigant has received by the final order he wished to attack all the relief available to him, he may not appeal from such judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“insofar as it imposes a penalty upon [the county,] is reversed and of no further force and effect and that the Order is otherwise affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“completely disposed of the matter and the additional language of the decree * * * had nothing to do with the determination of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.