State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 119 Wash. 2d 167 - State v. Johnson · 122 Wash. 2d 712 - State v. Hansen · 94 Wash. 2d 810 - State v. Price · Lewis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"RCW 40.16.030 encompass[es] a document which is required or permitted by statute or valid regulation to be filed, registered, or recorded in a public office if (1) the claimed falsity relates to a material fact represented in the instrument; and (2a) the information contained in the document is of such a nature that the government is required or permitted by law, statute or valid regulation to act in reliance thereon; or (2b) the information contained in the document materially affects significant rights or duties of third persons, when this effect is reasonably contemplated by the express or implied intent of the statute or valid regulation which requires the filing, registration, or recording of the document."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conte · State v. Conte“RCW 40.16.030 requires that a document be `required or permitted by law, statute or valid regulation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conte
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.