Sluman v. Dolan’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1961
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hinman v. C. H. Hamilton Paper Co. · Smith v. Rawlings' Administrator
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But we apprehend that the rule applicable to ordinary cumulative testimony on motions for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence is not applicable as applied to a case where a party to the action is the principal witness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. English
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.