Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 S.W.2d 813

Ex parte Depew

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1930

Texas Commission of Appeals · decided 1930-02-19

Relies on Ex Parte S.G. Gonzalez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-02-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2003 · most notably Curtis v. Gibbs (1974), Lancaster v. Lancaster (1956)

31 state decisions

10019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LEDDY, J.

¶1Relator was adjudged guilty of contempt by the Eiftv-Third district court of Travis county for the violation of a temporary injunction issued by the criminal district court of Travis county, now the Ninety-Eighth judicial district.

¶2Under the authority of Ex parte Gonzalez, 111 Tex. 399, 238 S. W. 635, one court in no ease is authorized to punish contempt in another court; hence the proceedings by which relator was adjudged guilty of contempt are void, and he is entitled, under the writ of habeas corpus sued out, to be released from custody.

¶3We recommend he be ordered discharged.

OURETON, C. J. The relator is discharged, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.
/24/sw2d/813 · .json · Public domain