Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 SW3D 251 - Deuser v. King

Deuser v. King’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Rustici v. Weidemeyer · Green v. Denison · Jungerman v. City of Raytown · Deuser ex rel. Sellers v. Vecera

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of a clerical nature and is performed in a prescribed manner according to legal mandate without regard to the public official's personal judgment or opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the exercise of reason in the adaption of means to an end and discretion in determining how or whether an act should be done or a course pursued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.