Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 S.W.3d 720

State v. Pierson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-01-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2007

2 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-01-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Albert Lee Pierson (appellant) appeals convictions of robbery in the first degree, pursuant to Section 569.020 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, pursuant to Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). We have reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/24/sw3d/720 · .json · Public domain