Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 SW3D 911 - McIntyre v. Smith

McIntyre v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 102nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on S.V. v. R.V. · Nardis Sportswear v. Simmons · Broders v. Heise · Bowles v. Bourdon · Hart v. Van Zandt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a duty by the physician to act according to a certain standard of care; (2) a breach of that standard of care; (3) an injury; and (4) a causal connection between the breach of care and the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.