Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Tex. 283

Underhill v. Thomas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1859-07-01

Error from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. Robert E. B. Baylor. This case was before this court, at the last term. (22 Texas Rop. 175.) The suit was brought May 30th, 1857, by Joseph M. Thomas, Hewling Cowperthwaite, Charles Desilver, and Jonathan Butler, under the firm name of Thomas, Cowperthwaite & Co., against James Willie, A. H. Willie, D. M. Under-hill, and Harden White, on their promissory note for $432.15.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1932

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Roberts, J.

¶1The statute requires the clerk of the Supreme Court to certify the judgments of the Supreme Court, to the courts from which the causes were brought. (O. & W. Dig. 415.) It does not prescribe the time when this shall be done. The mandate, in this case, was filed during the term, and after the first day thereof. The judgment by default, was taken the next day after the filing.

¶2The plaintiffs must be held to have known that their cause was disposed of in the Supreme Court, and was therefore liable to be sent into the District Court for its action. Upon them, process had been served; and when the mandate was filed in the District Court, the case stood as it had done before the first *285judgment was rendered. They were in court, through the process served on them. They were at liberty to make any defence which they had. Not having made any, the plaintiffs below had a right to discontinue as to those not served with process, and take their judgment by default as to those served. Judgment affirmed with damages.

¶3Affirmed with damages.

/24/tex/283 · .json · Public domain