Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Tex. 288

Baldridge v. Gordon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1859-07-01

Error from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. Robert E. B. Baylor. This was a suit by L. A. Gordon, the defendant in error, against the plaintiff in error. Judgment against him, for $1350. The only error assigned, was, that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1927

4 state decisions

1018591860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Roberts, J.

¶1There is evidence on both sides, sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict either way. It is a case of conflict in the evidence, to be determined by the jury. There is no deficiency of testimony to support the verdict. If credited by the jury, notwithstanding the effort to disprove it by adverse evidence, it was amply sufficient to sustain their verdict. Under such circumstances, the verdict will not be disturbed.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/24/tex/288 · .json · Public domain