Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

24 Tex. Ct. App. 521

Ware v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 7, 1888

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1888-01-07

Tried below before the Hon. R. H. Coleman, County Judge. The conviction in this case was for an assault and battery upon the person of Sylva Ware, who was shown by the evidence to be the mother of the appellant. The penalty assessed whs a fine of twenty-five dollars. The information under which this prosecution was had was based upon a complaint filed by George Ware, Sr., the father of the accused, and the husband of the alleged injured party.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1942

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1888-01-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Willsoh, Judge.

¶1To constitute an assault and battery, unlawful violence must be used upon the person of another, and such violence must be used with the intent to injure the person upon whom it is inflicted. Unlawful violence unaccompanied by such intent does not constitute the offense. (Willson’s Texas Crim. Laws, secs. 809, 811.) The intent to injure will be presumed when an injury has been inflicted, but when no injury has been inflicted such presumption will not prevail, and the intent must be proved. (Id., sec. 813.)

¶2In the case before us, conceding that the defendant used unlawful violence upon the person of his mother, the alleged assaulted party, it is not shown that she was injured by such violence either physically or mentally, or that he intended to inflict any injury upon her, but on the contrary the evidence shows that he had no such intention.

¶3In our opinion the verdict is not supported by the evidence, and the trial court erred in refusing the defendant a new trial. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

/24/texctapp/521 · .json · Public domain