Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 U.S. 258 - Armstrong v. Toler

Armstrong v. Toler’s Empirical Analysis

24 U.S. 258 · 1826

Citation profile

254
cited by 254 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
36
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 3 district · 149 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 254 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably Olmstead v. United States (1928), Hilton v. Guyot (1895)

52 federal appellate · 3 district · 149 state decisions — followed in 36 states

37018261830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 254 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the contract grows immediately out of, and is connected, with, an illegal or immoral act, a court of justice will not lend its aid to enforce it. And if the contract be in part only connected with the illegal transaction, and growing immediately out of it, though it be, in fact, a new contract, it is equally tainted by it.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The general proposition slated by Lord Mansfield, in Kaikney v. Keynous, that if one person paid tlie debt of another, at liis request, an action limy be sustained to recover the money, although the original contract was unlawful, goes far in deciding the question now before the court. That the .person who paid the money knew it was paid in discharge of a. debt not recoverable at lawr has never been held to alter the case.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Had the jury desired further information, they might, and probably would, have signified their desire to the Court. The utmost willingness was manifested to gratify them, and it may fairly be presumed that they had nothing farther to ask.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.