Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Va. App. 454 - Cruz v. Commonwealth

24 Va. App. 454 - Cruz v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2016

19 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · Illinois v. Allen · Ohio v. Gallagher · Taylor v. United States · Phelps Dodge Corp. v. AFL-CIO Joint Negotiating Committee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Vjoluntary waiver ... cannot be shown unless the defendant (1) has been given notice of his trial date; and (2) has been warned that his failure to appear could result in a trial in his absence. Cruz’s explanation that he missed trial because he drank too much and overslept clearly supports the trial court’s finding that his absence was, indeed, voluntary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A voluntary and intelligent waiver ... could be shown by establishing that an officer of the court has explained to the defendant that failure to appear at trial could result in his being tried in his absence. Here ... no Sisk warnings were given.... We ...' hold that voluntary absence, standing alone, does not constitute a knowing and intelligent waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.