Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 Wash. 25 - Fitch v. Applegate

Fitch v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 1986

21 state decisions

80190119101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Redford v. Spokane Street Railway Co. · Ivall v. Willis · Griffith v. Maxwell · Hitchcock v. Nixon · Overbeck v. Calligan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the language is ‘no mortgage, deed of trust or conveyance’; but we think that the intention of the law makers will not be reached by giving a literal interpretation to the language used, and that, if it had been the intention of the legislature to have made an extraordinary provision, as this would be, if so construed, it would have used language more clearly expressing such intention.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.