24 Wash. App. 92 - Roth v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 103 Wash. 2d 131 - Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp. (1984), 103 Wash. 2d 800 - Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 44 (1985)
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 3d 441 - Borer v. American Airlines, Inc. · 87 Wash. 2d 424 - Hunsley v. Giard · 89 Wash. 2d 673 - Halvorson v. Dahl · Carroll v. Kittle · General Electric Company v. Bush
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The mother or father or both may maintain an action as plaintiff for the injury or death of a minor child ... "... "In such an action, in addition to damages for medical, hospital, medication expenses, and loss of services and support, damages may be recovered for the loss of love and companionship of the child and for injury to or destruction of the parent-child relationship in such amount as, under all the circumstances of the case, may be just.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The mother or father or both may maintain an action as plaintiff for the injury or death of a minor child .... In such an action . . . damages may be recovered for the loss of love and companionship of the child and for injury to or destruction of the parent-child relationship in such amount as, under all the circumstances of the case, may be just. 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In making the essentially legal determination [under CR 12(b)(6)] of whether there is any state of facts that the plaintiffs could prove entitling them to relief under their claim, we accept as true the factual allegations of the complaint and, where necessary, those facts raised for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.