Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 WEND 13 - Hart v. Coltrain

Hart v. Coltrain’s Empirical Analysis

1840

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1929
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1929

3 state decisions

10184018501860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ford & Ford v. Walsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A motion for a new trial,-on a case made, is addressed to the sound discretion of the court-; and where the party relies on some defect in the proofs, which .is afterwards supplied by evidence which could not have been -controverted had it been produced at the proper time, and-the court see that a new trial could be of no use, the motion would be denied. (Burt v. Place, 4 Wend. 597 , and cases cited.) But tbis rule does not apply to a bill of exceptions, and we cannot look into tbe affidavit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.