Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 24 WIS2D 364 - Waddell v. State

Waddell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 1998 · most notably 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State (1975), State v. Green (1973)

48 state decisions

3401964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether this court should hold that, as a matter of law, the sentencing court must make the complete report, or any part of such report, available to the defendant and his counsel to permit them to offer rebuttal information or to make counterargument, is a matter we need not decide here since in the instant case the trial court made the entire presentence report available to defense counsel prior to the hearing on sentence. Neither the defendant nor his counsel offered any rebuttal information or argument and there was no abuse of discretion in the court’s use of this information. 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court may utilize data contained in a presentence investigation report in determining an appropriate sentence. . . . Typically, such reports contain pertinent information relating to the defendant’s . . . prior criminal record (if any)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “. . These complaints are evidence of a pattern of behavior which, in turn, is an index of the defendant’s character, a critical factor in the sentencing. . . .” Waddell v. State (1964), 24 Wis. 2d 364, 368 , 129 N. W. 2d 201 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.