¶1Order modified *1004so as to strike out only the first defense contained in the defendants’ answer, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the third, fourth and fifth defenses are sufficient in view of the character of plaintiff’s complaint and the demand by him of individual relief. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
240 A.D. 1003
Grubman v. Konoff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1933
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1933-12-15
Decided 1933-12-15