Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 ARK 1000 - Hardin v. Pennington

Hardin v. Pennington’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1973
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Stephens · Anderson v. State Ex Rel. King · Parmentier v. Ransom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial judge, in granting a new trial, explained, in detail that he had refused to give the appellee’s requested Instruction No. 5 and he did not think that the giving of any other instruction properly presented the issues. It is sufficient to say that the court in its sound discretion exercised its inherent power to grant a new trial; and that it is not shown that he acted arbitrarily in this case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.