Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 ARK 933 - Douglas v. Williams

Douglas v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rowe v. Allison · Phillips v. Rothrock · Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School District · Rich v. Walker · Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of Rector

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]lections will not be invalidated for alleged wrongs committed unless said wrongs were such to render the result doubtful. In order to destroy the result of an election it must be shown that wrongs against the freedom of election have prevailed, not slightly and in individual cases, but generally and to the extent to rendering the result doubtful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.