In Re Allen’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1121 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Rake v. Wade · United Carolina Bank v. Hall · Grundy National Bank v. Rife · Tillman v. Lombard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Valuing the collateral as of the filing date seems most appropriate because the filing date is the one which alters the rights otherwise possessed by the secured creditor under its documentation and state law to repossess the collateral, liquidate it and apply the sale proceeds to the debt. It also establishes consistency between valuation of wholly unsecured claims, which of course are established as of the filing date, and the unsecured portion of partially secured claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cahill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.