In Re Easley’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2004
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes) · Bandilli C. Boyajian (In Re Bandilli) · In Re Edwards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.