Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 CALAPP2D 24 - Hunter v. Schultz

Hunter v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
9
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2010

19 state decisions

60196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quock Ting v. United States · Davis v. Judson · 98 Cal. App. 2d 339 - La Jolla Casa deManana v. Hopkins · Payne v. Arkansas · Burns v. Hiatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen, in a suit for partition . . ., a cotenant who has been in possession or use of the premises seeks to obtain contribution respecting improvements made, or amounts expended in protection or preservation of the property, the court, as incidental to the granting of such relief and by way of adjusting the rights of the parties, may charge the claimant, defensively, with at least a part of the reasonable value of his occupancy or use[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.