Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.1d 819 - Fredenberg v. Whitney

Fredenberg v. Whitney’s Empirical Analysis

240 F. 819 · 1917

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1952

1 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

5019171920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · United States v. Grimaud · City of Walla Walla v. Walla Walla Water Co · Hiram Barber v. Huldah a Barber by Her Next Friend George Cronkhite · Kilbourn v. Sunderland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In these days of industrial expansion, parties should have a right to have any issue which involves their financial status speedily adjusted, and this right should not be permitted to rest upon the discretion of the other party, and a legal remedy, to be adequate, must be a remedy which the party himself controls and can assert at the moment. When there is a doubt in the mind of the chancellor as to the adequacy of the remedy, that doubt should he resolved in favor of the petitioners.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Every pilot, engineer, mate, or master of any steam-vessel * * * who neglects or refuses to observe the provisions of this Act * * * shall be liable to a penalty of fifty dollars: - * * Provided, that nothing herein shall relieve any vessel, owner or corporation from any liability incurred by reason of such neglect or refusal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"Tito law in issue is clearly penal, and under all of the authorities, must be strictly construed. Liberal construction, as suggested by the defendants, cannot prevail in such a proceeding. Nor can the penalty be invoked and the provisions enforced unless the penalty is plainly imposed by the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.