Stringer v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis
240 F. 892 · 1917
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1934
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Case v. Beauregard · Fitzpatrick v. Flannagan · Huiskamp v. Moline Wagon Co. · Allen v. Center Valley Co. · National Bank of Salem v. . Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘•If these facts be assumed, we have a liability in favor of Lewis against the firm of Jewell & Stringer. That liability became the personal liability of Stringer, Sr., on the dissolution of the firm of Jewell & Stringer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Stringer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.