Greene v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
240 F.2d 275 · 1957
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2009
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldie v. Cox · United States v. Weissman · In re Bush Terminal Co. · 134 F. Supp. 158 - In Re Totem Lodge & Country Club, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A common sense interpretation of the statute [Section 7(b)] according to its intent would avoid reading into it an exclusion of those fiduciaries, only lately retired, who have the most direct knowledge of the matters as to which information is required.” Greene v. Harris, 1957, 240 F.2d 275, 276 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.